Technological ‘mind control’ could be double-edged sword

On July 13th 2006, Reuters News Service reported that a paralyzed man
using a new type of brain sensor, started moving a computer cursor, opening
email and controlling a robotic device…all accomplished by the user thinking
about the action.

“The testing of the BrainGate Sensor,” developed by Cyberkenetics Neurotechnology Systems, Inc. in Massachusetts,”would be the first step in an ongoing trial of a device that would help people with paralysis, “ Doctor Hochberg of Massachusetts General Hospital stated.

And, in a separate study, Doctor Stephen Ryu stated that there was a faster way to process the signals to control a computer or prosthetic device.
“This type of prosthetic systems is clinically viable,” he mentioned.

But can this advanced technology be used for purposes not-so well intentioned? With computer-guidance systems, bodily-inserted nanobyte technology and electrode implants all being very real possibilities, could such technology be used by criminals, private militias, or even, terrorists?

“The technology in and of itself is not good or bad; it’s what the individual or groups of individuals utilize it for,” stated Eric J. Obmann, author of the fictional novel, October 31st, in which the villain infuses diabolical technology with Halloween masks.

“Both sides of the law are always looking for that technological ‘edge’ which could mean either failure or success in what they attempt. Mind control could be used for militant intelligence or weaponry guidance for either side. If the technology and its methods rapidly advance, as they inevitably will, technological watchdog groups will have to be extra vigilant and be able to act quickly to enforce ethical standards for its various uses.”

Eric J. Obmann’s book, October 31st, can be purchased at Amazon.com, Barnes&Nobles.com and at the publisher’s Online Bookstore at www.publishamerica.com